Comprehensive Game Analysis
Our analysis pipeline is powered by heuristics, algorithms and a touch of locally run LLM magic to connect the hidden dots - it takes a deep dive into every aspect of your game's reception, giving you actionable insights to improve player satisfaction and drive growth.
Vision-Promise Alignment
Detailed analysis of how well your game delivers on its vision and promises with strategic recommendations for improvement
Comprehensive Category Analysis
Detailed scoring across 20+ categories and 140+ sub-categories including Gameplay, Narrative, Technical Issues, UX/UI, and more
Player Engagement Intelligence
Steam API integration providing engagement distribution analysis, playtime insights, and behavioral profiling across player segments
Advanced Emotional Analysis
Comprehensive emotional intelligence analysis including dominant emotions, brain pattern analysis, emotional triggers, and player journey mapping
Player Archetype Profiling
Comprehensive player archetype analysis identifying key player types with behavioral insights and motivational drivers
Real Player Snippets & Sentiment
Authentic player quotes categorized by emotion and topic, showing exactly what players are saying about your game
Neurobiological & Psychological Insights
Deep brain analysis, motivational signatures, and psychological triggers that drive player behavior and retention
See CoreScore in Action
Interactive dashboard showing real insights from actual game analysis. This is what every CoreScore report delivers.
Executive Summary
High-level overview with key metrics and performance indicators
Executive Summary
Top Performing Categories
Areas Needing Attention
Player Insights
Engagement Distribution
Top Player Archetypes
Top Motivational Drivers
Strategic Overview
Vision Alignment
Key Vision Elements
- • Squad-based combat and management
- • Open-ended sandbox gameplay
- • Realistic survival mechanics
- • Base building and resource management
Platform Insights
Game Vision & Promise
“We promise a demanding, PC-first sandbox RPG where every victory is earned. Lead a fragile squad to strength through systemic simulation, base building, and hard choices. No rubber-band scaling, no scripted heroism—just a reactive world that remembers what you do and rewards mastery over time.”
Developer Vision
Build a simulation-driven RPG that treats the player as one agent among many—where systems, not scripts, create stories. We value consequence, scarcity, and player agency over polish-for-polish’s sake. The goal: a world that is harsh but fair, where small wins snowball into legendary arcs for squads you’ve trained and scars you’ve earned.
Public-Facing Description
A premium, squad-based sandbox RPG for PC and console. Train a band of nobodies into hardened survivors, carve out a base in hostile territory, and navigate a reactive world without safety rails. Trade, raid, research, and rebuild—your story emerges from the systems you master and the risks you take.
Vision Alignment Metrics
Vision Themes
Primary Themes
Secondary Themes
Detected Vision Elements
Squad-based combat and management
3.1xPlayers frequently cite training, recovery, and composition choices as core to long-term success.
Open-ended sandbox gameplay
2.9xMultiple paths to power—trading, raiding, recruiting, and research—are called out as meaningful and viable.
Realistic survival mechanics
2.7xInjury, attrition, and logistics matter; early defeats shape memorable comeback arcs.
Base building and resource management
2.6xPlayers discuss fortification layouts, supply lines, and production loops as strategic anchors.
No level scaling; earned progression
3.3xDifficulty stays constant while squads improve—frustration becomes pride as mastery grows.
Multiple viable roles and playstyles
2.4xFrom nomad traders to warlords, roles are validated by player stories and long-play sessions.
Independent, reactive game world
2.8xFactions clash without the player; choices ripple across regions and supply routes.
No designated hero characters
2.2xLosses are consequential; attachment forms around squads rather than invulnerable protagonists.
Understanding the Weight System
Tag Analysis
Well-Experienced Tags
Underperforming Tags
Suggested Tags
Alignment Analysis
Alignment Successes
Emergent Mastery Loop
Players describe early hardship turning into long-form empowerment through systems mastery and squad growth.
Sandbox Role Validity
Trader, raider, researcher, builder—multiple roles feel viable and respected by the game’s economy and factions.
Alignment Failures
Onboarding Opacity
Advanced systems and edge-case rules are under-explained; players rely on external guides and trial-and-error.
Performance Roughness
Shader compilation stutter and busy hub drops occasionally break immersion despite strong underlying systems.
Enhanced Alignment Score
Combined Vision + Tag Alignment Score
Category Performance
Content
Narrative & World-Building
Trust & Developer Reputation
Community Features
Gameplay & Mechanics
UX & UI
Performance
Localisation & Language Support
Technical Stability
Monetisation
Detailed Category Analysis
Content
Awe & curiosity on first contact with systems and world hooks; players report a ‘pull’ to test boundaries.
Sustained motivation from layered quest chains and optional mastery routes; tension spikes during set-piece missions.
Triumph and pride from completion runs and challenge ladders; nostalgia when revisiting solved spaces for optimization.
What's Working
Explorers (41%) drive discovery across hidden routes, optional regions, and lore pockets, while Collectors (18.5%) keep momentum via set completion, achievements, and long-tail collection loops. Storytellers (17.2%) call out side arcs that meaningfully reinforce the central themes rather than feeling like filler. Conquerors (10.6%) appreciate opt-in challenge ladders that scale cleanly into late game. The combined effect is a strong curiosity → mastery arc with enough mission variety to sustain multiple runs, supported by Creator (6.3%) workshop builds and light Competitor (4%) min-maxing culture that surfaces “how far can this go?” moments.
Areas for Improvement
When optional chains stretch past several hours, both Collectors (18.5%) and Storytellers (17.2%) want clearer signposting and reward previews to judge time investment. Explorers (41%) ask for a few more late-game novelty beats to avoid over-familiar route planning. A small slice of Conquerors (10.6%) request escalations that remix earlier mechanics rather than only scaling numbers, keeping victory conditions fresh without grinding.
Gameplay & Mechanics
Curiosity with moments of confusion during dense onboarding.
Flow emerges as players internalize timing windows and synergies; tension → relief loops drive stickiness.
Mastery pride; desire for fresh mechanics to avoid plateau.
What's Working
Conquerors (22%) highlight the satisfaction of overcoming tightly tuned encounters that reward planning and risk management. Competitors (19.5%) praise expressive loadouts and timing-based windows that create meaningful “outplays,” while Explorers (18.6%) enjoy surfacing emergent interactions between systems. Collectors (13.4%) stick around to perfect routes and stat thresholds; Creators (9.2%) iterate on community-tested builds that keep the meta lively. Even Storytellers (8%) call out set-piece battles that reinforce narrative stakes, with Thrill-Seekers (6.3%) enjoying the high-tension spike moments.
Areas for Improvement
The onboarding is dense: Explorers (18.6%) and Collectors (13.4%) ask for advanced tooltips and clearer status/stacking rules. Mid-game pacing can plateau for Conquerors (22%) and Competitors (19.5%) when encounter variety leans on HP/armor scaling rather than new tactical puzzles. Requests include: rotating elite modifiers, encounter rule twists, and “teaching arenas” that surface late-game mechanics without a wiki. Storytellers (8%) want climactic fights to evolve phases more distinctly so payoffs feel earned.
UX & UI
Overwhelm from dense menus and small fonts on TV distance.
Irritation when searching settings or rebinding on controller.
Relief once muscle memory develops; desire for more customization.
What's Working
Power users note that hotkey customization and HUD scaling reduce friction for Collectors (24%) tracking many resources and for Competitors (14%) who want fast access to combat-critical info. Conquerors (18%) appreciate clear damage/mitigation readouts when available.
Areas for Improvement
Primary pain: readability and menu density. Explorers (16%) and Storytellers (12%) struggle with small fonts and nested settings, especially on couch setups; Collectors (24%) request filter/search in inventories and recipe lists. Competitors (14%) want consistent gamepad hinting and quicker rebinding. Suggested fixes: global font scale, higher-contrast presets, settings search, and streamlined controller navigation for deep menus.
Performance
Annoyance at first-run shader stutter undermining early awe.
Frustration spikes during large encounters and hubs.
Acceptance/workarounds for some; churn risk for others.
What's Working
Stable play is reported in small indoor spaces and solo exploration; windowed-fullscreen helps some setups. This is enough for Explorers (16%) and Collectors (12%) to progress when not in busy hubs.
Areas for Improvement
Competitors (26%) and Conquerors (20%) flag frame drops during peak intensity (boss phases, dense effects). Explorers (16%) and Storytellers (10%) call out shader-compile stutter that breaks immersion in new biomes. Priorities: ship precompiled shaders, cap heavy particle overdraw, and profile crowd scenes; add “Performance Focus” preset that dials back heavy post-FX by default on mid-range GPUs.
Technical Stability
Skepticism turns to trust post-first patch.
Calm sessions with rare spikes from edge-case bugs.
Confidence due to autosave & rollback safety nets.
What's Working
Autosave cadence and rollback safety nets protect progress, which matters most to Collectors (22%) and Explorers (18%) on long sessions. Conquerors (16%) note that once shaders are cached, stability during standard encounters is reliable.
Areas for Improvement
Startup instability tied to overlays/alt-tab and intermittent I/O hitching on HDD installs. Creators (12%) report confusing mod conflict states; Socializers (6%) see session desync after hotfixes. Actions: delay-load overlays, improve asset streaming, provide clearer mod conflict messaging and “safe mode” boot to isolate broken items.
Localisation & Language Support
Confusion from inconsistent terminology in tutorials.
Irritation at text overflow and partial translations.
Detachment from story beats in non-English locales.
What's Working
Core UI strings are covered for major EU locales and a maintained glossary has improved consistency, reducing friction for Explorers (20%) and Collectors (16%) during systems play.
Areas for Improvement
Storytellers (28%) report inconsistent terminology and untranslated tutorial lines undermining narrative clarity. Text overflows (DE/ES) and missing font fallback for CJK reduce readability for Explorers (20%). Next steps: terminology pass on tutorials, dynamic box resizing, and font fallback bundles; evaluate VO coverage parity for key story moments.
Narrative & World-Building
Intrigue from strong hooks and environmental foreshadowing.
Attachment to companions/factions; tension across branching dilemmas.
Catharsis and reflection; desire for post-campaign epilogues.
What's Working
Storytellers (33%) and Explorers (28%) anchor praise for consistent tone, environmental foreshadowing, and faction identity. Collectors (14%) appreciate discoverable lore fragments that reward thorough play. Conquerors (10%) point out pivotal boss encounters that land emotional payoffs. Overall: frequent “one more quest” pull with clear cause-and-effect across arcs.
Areas for Improvement
A minority note tonal whiplash or abruptly resolved arcs; Storytellers (33%) request optional recaps on long chains. Explorers (28%) want additional diegetic breadcrumbs to find late-game side stories. Small ask from Creators (7%): better in-game codex links to shareable entries for community wikis.
Community Features
Excitement joining co-op and browsing workshop.
Belonging via group challenges and creator spotlights.
Pride in shared creations and community recognition.
What's Working
Socializers (32%) and Creators (27%) credit Workshop curation and load-order clarity for keeping the scene active. Explorers (16%) enjoy browsing scenario mods; Collectors (10%) appreciate blueprint sharing and versioned presets.
Areas for Improvement
Post-patch mod breakage and conflicts confuse first-time users. Actions: auto-detect incompatible versions, add “repair loadout” button, and expose dependency trees. Conquerors (7%) request co-op challenge templates; Competitors (5%) want better leaderboards with anti-cheat signals.
Monetisation
Satisfaction with premium value proposition.
Motivation tied to content-rich expansions over cosmetics.
Goodwill if DLC cadence respects player time.
What's Working
Collectors (30%) and Storytellers (24%) view the premium price as fair when expansions add depth, new questlines, and systems. Explorers (18%) praise map extensions and new mechanics over cosmetic-only drops. The general read is “additive, not extractive.”
Areas for Improvement
Store page under-communicates late-game breadth; add clearer bundle composition, end-game previews, and “who is this for?” callouts. Conquerors (10%) want difficulty notes; Creators (8%) want modding notes per DLC.
Trust & Developer Reputation
Cautious optimism from transparent messaging.
Reassurance via responsive hotfix cadence.
Loyalty from roadmap follow-through.
What's Working
Transparent patch notes and candid dev posts resonate with Collectors (22%), Storytellers (19%), and Explorers (18%). Quick hotfix cadence after major drops builds goodwill across Conquerors (14%) and Competitors (10%).
Areas for Improvement
Players ask for tighter roadmap windows and clearer “next 90 days” scope to avoid over-speculation; a living changelog with status tags would close the loop.
Player Archetype Analysis
Dominant archetypes: Explorer, Conqueror, Storyteller represent 47.7% of feedback. Underrepresented types suggest opportunities in Social tools and high-risk challenge modes.
Explorer ↔ Storyteller reinforce discovery-led narrative; Conqueror ↔ Competitor drive mastery ladders and challenge runs; Creator ↔ Socializer amplify UGC + community events.
- Explorer/Storyteller: expand codex recaps, lore routes, consequence previews.
- Conqueror/Competitor: time trials, ghost runs, ranked ladders.
- Creator/Socializer: curated workshop spotlights, template sharing, event hubs.
Categories with No Data
The following categories had insufficient direct feedback in this sample and were not scored:
Consider targeted surveys or tagging rules to collect focused feedback for these areas.
Strategic Action Plan
Critical (0–30 days)
Stutter & Frametime Hotfix
Ship a shader precompile step, add a ‘First-Run Optimization’ toggle, and publish vendor-specific setup notes in the launcher.
UI Readability Pass
Increase default font scale, boost contrast in dense tables, and add search to Settings & Keybinds.
Onboarding Refresh
Contextual tips for advanced systems; allow players to replay/skip tutorial modules at any time.
Growth (1–3 months)
Event & Co-op Momentum
Calendarize weekend events with clear rewards; add lobby filters for role preferences and skill bands.
Lore Compendium
Add codex recaps and a timeline view; reward exploration with cosmetic titles tied to discoverables.
Buildcraft Sandbox
Introduce a test range with target dummies and DPS readouts to accelerate theorycrafting.
Psychology & UX
Agency & Autonomy
Expose granular difficulty modifiers and mode presets; preview consequences before committing to long quests.
Competence & Mastery
Weekly challenge ladders with ghost runs and loadout sharing to reinforce skill growth.
Relatedness & Community
In-game group finder tags (casual/learning/experienced) and lightweight post-match commendations.
Revenue Growth
First-Hour Conversion
Streamline early goals with clear rewards; surface edition differences in-game during the honeymoon period.
Cosmetic Seasons
Rotate limited themes aligned to events; add in-hub character previews.
Creator Bundles
Curate build kits/cosmetics with community creators; revenue share and featured tabs in store.
Analysis Summary
Insights from 312 player reviews • GameDataCore Vision-Emotion Intelligence Engine
Narrative & World-Building Snippets
Story, characters, and world-building elements
“The moment the systems clicked, it felt like learning a new language—and suddenly the world answered back.”
“Characters grow through choices, not cutscenes. My crew feels like a history I actually lived.”
“Storms, patrols, and scarcity kept rewriting my plan into better stories than I could script.”
“The UI is dense, but once you know where to look, every panel earns its real estate.”
“Great ideas, but the early hours feel opaque and borderline hostile to newcomers.”
“Failed three expeditions; the fourth finally stuck and turned into a triumphant, unforgettable run.”
“Sound design sells the tension—alarms still spike my heart rate every single time.”
“Combat feels weighty, but reads a bit slow in crowded fights.”
“No hand-holding, and yet the victories feel earned instead of granted.”
“Performance dips during heavy weather undercut a few big moments.”
“I came for the sandbox and stayed for the stories I keep telling afterwards.”
“Base-building is harsh but elegant—every wall and route ends up telling its own story.”
“The economy swings are fun to exploit, occasionally immersion-breaking.”
“Exploration is intoxicating—every ridge hides a choice that actually matters.”
“Tooltips lag behind the mechanics; discovery sometimes feels like pure guesswork.”
“Failure loops teach better than any tutorial—I’m weirdly grateful for how stubborn it is.”
“Controller support is fine, but inventory management still feels fiddly.”
“One rescue spiraled into a two-hour chain of near-misses. Absolute chef’s kiss.”
“Hard, fair, and empowering—the world doesn’t bend; I do.”
“Lost progress to a save hiccup once; trust took a hit until it stabilized.”
Archetype Dynamics
Player type distribution and dominant behavioral patterns in Eclipse Protocol
Explorer
40.2%Scouts who roam derelict zones, catalogue anomalies, and connect the lore through lived discovery.
Collector
26.9%Completionists who optimise routes, finish codices, and chase perfect sets across seasons.
Conqueror
25.4%High-agency players who seek harsh tests, optimise builds, and measure progress by hard-won victories.
Player Base Analysis
Distribution Overview
Playtime Distribution
Player engagement patterns based on 98 reviews
Key Metrics
Player Distribution
Retention Patterns
- • Strong mid-tier engagement indicates sticky core loops
- • High average playtime signals durable long-tail retention
Business Implications
- • Prioritise content for 50–500h cohorts (70%+)
- • Invest in community stories and challenge events
- • 206h average engagement = excellent value delivery
Advanced Behavioral Intelligence
Comprehensive analysis from 36 behavioural profiles with real engagement data
Engagement Distribution
Platform & Purchase Insights
Brain Analysis Preview
Player Motivational Signatures
Top Motivational Drivers
Motivation Insights
Intrinsic drivers dominate: players stay for self-defined goals, emergent stories, and the satisfaction of mastering harsh systems.
Explorer
Scans the unknown, maps hazards, and pieces together the world’s rules. Finds joy in first contact and connecting clues.
Primary Motivation
Neurobiological Basis
Personality Profile
Gameplay Preferences
Secondary Motivations
Strategic Insights
Real Player Examples
Key Metrics
Collector
Plans optimised routes, completes sets, and tracks progress across long-term goals. Satisfaction peaks on 100% runs.
Primary Motivation
Neurobiological Basis
Personality Profile
Gameplay Preferences
Secondary Motivations
Strategic Insights
Real Player Examples
Key Metrics
Conqueror
Seeks brutal tests and skill expression. Measures success by pushing into red-zone content and surviving consequence loops.
Primary Motivation
Neurobiological Basis
Personality Profile
Gameplay Preferences
Secondary Motivations
Strategic Insights
Real Player Examples
Key Metrics
Cross-Archetype Relationships Matrix
How different player archetypes complement, conflict, or synergize with each other
Synergistic Pairs
Discovery feeds completion; completion unlocks deeper discovery loops.
Optimised routes meet high-risk challenges for prestige runs.
Scouting empowers bold pushes into red-zone content.
Market Opportunities
Expand narrative journaling and share tools for story-first players.
Time-limited hazards and chase events to spike adrenaline.
Light asynchronous leaderboards for prestige without PvP overhead.
Dominant Player Emotion
The Eclipse Protocol Paradox
Empowerment emerges as the dominant emotional arc within Eclipse Protocol’s intentionally demanding design — a quality players both respect and celebrate.
Review analysis reveals a challenge-driven satisfaction model, where 31.2% of players invest over 200 hours not in spite of the difficulty, but because of it.
A striking paradox runs through many reviews: players catalogue flaws in detail — dated visuals, eccentric physics, stubborn quirks — yet in the same breath proclaim it one of the best games they’ve ever played.
This coexistence of critique and adoration points to a deeper emotional bond, where imperfection is not a deterrent, but part of the game’s identity.
Emotional journey:
• Early stage – frustration, anxiety, and uncertainty dominate as the steep learning curve takes hold.
• Midway – determination and resilience replace hesitation, as players reframe setbacks into personal milestones.
• Late stage – triumph and mastery emerge, with many describing their endurance as proof of growth.
Rather than resisting the game’s uncompromising vision, players embrace it — drawing motivation from its rough edges and meaning from its challenges.
Here, struggle becomes the reward, flaws become folklore, and moments of vulnerability transform into lasting empowerment.
Player Voices
“Outdated rendering, clunky physics, UI from a different era — and somehow the most gripping game I’ve played in years. Peak.”
Brain Analysis
Developer Insights
Your emotional complexity (0.289) and coherence (0.476) reflect mixed first-contact experiences: some players call the world “transformative,” others find early systems “opaque.” To improve consistency, streamline friction points that break immersion, keep the atmospheric elements that create wonder, balance harsh onboarding with clearer first-hour intent signals, and polish rough edges without diluting the game’s uncompromising character.
Emotional Journey Patterns
Developer Insights
Marketing Guidelines:
Your 23 volatile journeys generate contradictory, shareable stories (“brutal but brilliant”). This intensity fuels discovery; highlight player-made anecdotes and near-disaster recoveries to amplify word of mouth.
High Coherence Player Profile:
17 players who immediately “get” Eclipse Protocol share traits: they value emergent problem-solving, accept non-linear progression, and view difficulty as meaningful. They create self-defined roles (salvager, cartographer, warden) and treat setbacks as part of the story they’re building.
Onboarding Especially:
Create targeted tutorials highlighting: (1) Eclipse Protocol’s sandbox texture vs. guided RPGs, (2) emergent storytelling possibilities, (3) meaningful progression through adversity, and (4) player agency in defining roles. Convert complex-journey players without compromising the unforgiving core that high-coherence players love.
Actual Player Emotions
Player Motivational Signatures
Developer Insights
High Affective Resonance (54.8%) aligns with player praise for atmosphere and systemic consistency. Focus on expanding environmental storytelling that fuels immersion, deepen inter-system interactions that create emergent stories, and preserve the game’s identity while smoothing sharp onboarding spikes.
Narrative Function Analysis
How players express emotions in their reviews
Developer Insights
Players mostly use descriptive language (72.6%), recounting personal runs and close calls. This indicates strong memory formation and share-worthy stories. Lean into tools that let players narrate their journeys (journals, tags, event logs) and keep the world coherent so descriptions feel meaningful rather than random.
Emotional Intensity Patterns
High-intensity emotions indicate deep player engagement
Developer Insights
Peaks in Euphoria, Awe, and Absorption reflect passionate responses to emergent rescues, long-shot victories, and first contact with unknown zones. Preserve high-stakes tension, reward mastery with clear feedback, and avoid dampening consequence loops that make triumph meaningful.
Self-Determination Theory Analysis
Psychological needs satisfaction based on established research
Psychological Insights
Despite low traditional SDT scores (9.3%), engagement is exceptional with 200–400+ hour playtimes and reports of “I can’t stop.” This indicates a challenge-driven satisfaction model where fulfillment comes from mastering harsh systems. Low autonomy reflects an intentionally unforgiving world; competence gains come from learning deep, interlocking mechanics. Strengthen first-hour intent cues and keep long-tail mastery intact.
Surprise & Viral Potential Analysis
Positive Surprises
“It can be a grind. It can be cruel. But the atmosphere, the systems talking to each other, and the freedom to recover from failure make Eclipse Protocol unforgettable.”
Depth Surprises
“Hundreds of hours in and I’m still uncovering new interactions. It’s unfriendly at first, but the depth keeps paying out.”
Gameplay Surprises
“Found this by accident and it reignited my love for complex games. So many ways to approach problems and every run tells a different story.”
Developer Insights & Strategic Recommendations
Medium viral potential suggests strong but niche appeal. Recommendations: Showcase emergent recoveries and player-defined goals in trailers; surface optional guidance tools without downplaying the core harshness; and encourage community story-sharing to amplify unique outcomes that drive acquisition.
Developer Psychology Insights
Challenge-Driven Development Strategy
Strategic Priorities for Challenge-Focused Games:
- • Preserve Core Challenge: Maintain high stakes and consequence loops while improving feedback clarity.
- • Enhance Victory Recognition: Make hard-earned achievements more visible and contextual, not easier.
- • Deepen World Connections: Expand environmental storytelling and systemic consequences over added convenience.
- • Optional Guidance Tools: Offer gentle on-ramps that don’t blunt the intended edge.
Emotional Trigger Intelligence
Words and concepts that trigger strong emotional responses
Developer Insights
Triggers like “unique,” “mastery,” and “freedom” spike during breakthrough moments: establishing a safe foothold, navigating storms successfully, or chaining systems for a comeback. Preserve these high-stakes beats and enhance their readability with better celebration, clearer consequences, and lore hooks that contextualise success.
Marketing & Positioning Strategy:
With “unique” and “mastery” as top triggers, position Eclipse Protocol as “Uncompromising by Default, Accessible by Choice.” Market the core as unguided but note optional assists for curious newcomers. Lead with shareable comeback stories, hours-played stats, and the promise that every failure teaches the rules of the world.
Detailed Report Insights
Every CoreScore report includes comprehensive dashboards with actionable data visualizations
Executive Summary Dashboard
Overall CoreScore, Vision Delivery, Audience Alignment, and key engagement metrics consolidated in one comprehensive view
Category Performance Analysis
Detailed scoring across all major categories including Content, Narrative, Performance, UX/UI, and other critical areas
Player Sentiment Snippets
Authentic player quotes categorized by emotion with detailed sentiment analysis and emotional distribution breakdowns
Vision Alignment Metrics
Promise and Tag Alignment scores with detected vision elements and confidence analysis for strategic positioning
Engagement & Playtime Analysis
Distribution charts showing player engagement levels across different playtime ranges with retention insights and patterns
Strategic Recommendations
Prioritized roadmap with "What's Working" vs "Areas for Improvement" backed by comprehensive review analysis
All insights are powered by a combination of heuristic and algorithmic modelling, embedded custom taxonomies covering emotions, motivations, tone, gamer slang, and more, built using our collective 30+ years of games industry knowledge running studios and releasing games across indie, AA, AAA and mobile and custom fine-tuned, locally run AI models that help connect the dots and provide actionable insights from the data you can implement immediately.
Simple, Transparent Pricing
Get comprehensive insights for your game with our one-time report
Snapshot
Essential insights for early-stage games
Need Custom Analysis?
For enterprise clients, bulk reports, or custom analysis requirements, our team can create tailored solutions for your studio.
Enterprise Solutions
- Custom dashboards and ongoing monitoring
- Multi-game portfolio tracking
- Real-time sentiment alerts
Bulk Reporting
- Analyze multiple games with volume discounts
- Competitive benchmarking across titles
- Historical trend analysis
Dedicated Support
- Direct access to our analytics team
- Custom integrations with your tools
- Strategic consultation sessions
Ready to Get Started?
Fill out our contact form and our team will get back to you within 24 hours with a custom quote.
What we need:
- Your game's Steam page URL
- Specific analysis requirements
- Timeline and budget considerations
- Current player feedback challenges
Quick turnaround:
Comprehensive Proposal
We'll provide a comprehensive proposal including sample insights, methodology overview, and detailed timeline for your project.